Monday, August 24, 2020
Saturday, August 22, 2020
This article gives a basic intelligent examination of my life experiencing childhood in Jamaica where I went to pioneer school, to making the change to secondary school in the Canadian setting. I look at the components that have affected my social/racial way of life as an individual of African heritage living in the diaspora. I pose inquiries, for example, how has provincial instruction affected my social character and how I see myself? I address the unpredictability of my racial and sexual orientation personality drawing on a Black women's activist hypothetical structure and anticolonial thought to educate this work. Cet article presente une dissect scrutinize et reflechie de mon enfance en Jamaique, ou jÃ¢â¬â¢ai etudie an une ecole coloniale, et de mama change vers lÃ¢â¬â¢ecole secondaire au Canada. Je me penche sur les components qui ont impact mon identite culturelle/raciale comme personne dÃ¢â¬â¢ascendance africaine vivant dans la diaspora. Je offer des conversation starters portant sur lÃ¢â¬â¢influence de lÃ¢â¬â¢education coloniale sur mon identite culturelle et mama facon de me voir. Ce travail rest sur le framework theorique du feminisme noir, ainsi que sur la pensee anticoloniale. Presentation The reason for this article is to inspect the powers that have molded my way of life as an offspring of the African diaspora, first experiencing childhood in the Caribbean and afterward the experience between my Jamaican culture and the Canadian social setting. I endeavor to address the accompanying inquiries: How has my personality been framed? What parts of my life have been respected, and what parts are prohibited and why? How does society see me versus my own meaning of myself? Furthermore, increasingly significant, how might I rescue and keep up my personality? I fundamentally draw on the truth, quandaries, and inconsistencies of life that demonstrate my battle to arrange my personality and mindfulness as a person of African heritage in the Jamaican and later the Canadian instruction framework. The conversation in this article is educated by a Black women's activist viewpoint. I accept that guessing from a Black women's activist verbose structure encourages me to recount to my story and reconsider my encounters in a worldview that considers the social elements of race, class, sex, sexuality, and different types of control. Moreover, I utilize an anticolonial system, as this underscores the intensity of bigotry, colonization, and government on diasporic people groups and their personality (Dei, 2002). My Discursive Framework As referenced over, this article takes a Black women's activist angle as per the viewpoint of a Black hetero lady living in Canada. It is an approachÃ¢â¬a frameworkÃ¢â¬from which one can challenge frameworks of Erica Neegan is a doctoral applicant at the University of Toronto. Her exploration intrigue incorporates Indigenous Knowledges, Black women's activist idea and hostile to pilgrim and decolonizing teaching method. Building My Cultural Identity mastery in the public arena. A Black women's activist talk encourages me to recount to my story and recover my way of life as a Black lady. As Wane (2002) notes in her meaning of Black women's activist idea, Black women's activist idea is a hypothetical instrument intended to explain and break down the recorded, social and monetary connections of ladies of African drop as the reason for improvement of a liberatory praxis Ã¢â¬ ¦ It can be applied to arrange Black womenÃ¢â¬â¢s over a wide span of time encounters that are grounded in their numerous persecutions. (p. 38) Dark woman's rights has given a space and a system for the outflow of Black womenÃ¢â¬â¢s various characters. I accept that Black Canadian women's activist idea is educated by training and the other way around. At the end of the day, my lived real factors illuminate hypothesis and help me to comprehend what is happening around me. Dark Canadian women's activist hypothesis, at that point, turns into a down to earth path for me to understand my encounters in a Canadian setting opposite Black ladies in the United States setting. This makes it particularly noteworthy to recount to my story as a Black lady encountering life in Canada. Be that as it may, sharing oneÃ¢â¬â¢s story can be agonizing. However it can likewise be a freeing and transformatory experience. snares (1993) composes, Ã¢â¬Å"Telling reality with regards to oneÃ¢â¬â¢s life isn't just about naming the awful things, such as uncovering detestations. It is additionally about having the option to talk straightforwardly and actually about emotions and experiencesÃ¢â¬ (p. 27). Simultaneously, it must be noticed that Black womenÃ¢â¬â¢s encounters are not homogeneous, however they do share an unmistakable type of abuse. By utilizing a Black women's activist system, racialized and gendered people can all things considered imprint their essence on the planet where Black ladies have for such a long time been prevented the benefit from securing speaking (Mirza, 1997). Moreover, Parmar (1987) brings up that being thrown in the job of the OtherÃ¢â¬marginalized and oppressed in regular talk, yet in addition in the excellent accounts of European thoughtÃ¢â¬Black ladies have battled to attest secretly and freely their feeling of self, a self established specifically history societies and dialects. In this way the encounters of ladies of African plummet are significant to Black women's activist idea. Thusly, Black women's activist hypothesis catches our encounters and encourages us to reproduce our lives in a positive structure. Related to Black women's activist hypothesis, I likewise take on an anticolonial, digressive structure since it challenges frameworks of control and subjection and their proceeding with consequences for Indigenous people groups over the world. Besides, on the grounds that anticolonial talk is about the nonattendance of provincial burden, imperialism must be seen not from the point of view of being outside, but instead as an arrangement of mastery and success (Dei, 2002). This sort of talk permits one to challenge standardized frameworks of mastery. Impressions of my Lived Reality I talk from the point of view of an individual who is colonized. Because of my encounters, I have a sharp information on government, and its impact is integral to the decolonization procedure, which thus is at the center of recovering my personality. Before this should be possible, I have to know who I am. In the wake of tuning in to a talk on race and portrayal by Hall (1997), I presumed that I was a social cross breed. That is, my character isn't fixed, yet changes relying upon where I am. As Hall attests, social personality comesÃ¢ 273 E. Neegan from some place and has a history. Be that as it may, social character isn't static and is dependent upon the constant play of history, force, and culture. Thus, TwoTrees (1993) depicts herself: Ã¢â¬Å"I consider myself to be a multi-dimensional: faceted being, one feature being lady, one craftsman, one African American, one Native American. To discuss any one feature more than another dulls the excellence o f the entire thing reflecting lightÃ¢â¬ (p. 14). I recall when I was an adolescent gazing at myself in the mirror and asking myself the inquiry Ã¢â¬Å"Who right? Ã¢â¬ Years after the fact, I envision glancing through a split mirror and seeing inventions: a misshaped, divided picture of myself. I am as yet looking for the genuine me. As a matter of first importance, am I from Africa? Experiencing childhood in Jamaica and in Canada, it was very hard to connect myself with being from Africa. For me Africa was a messy word. I actually imagined that Africans resembled monkeys, swinging from vines and needing being Ã¢â¬Å"civilized. Ã¢â¬ So I totally wouldn't be marked African. However one can't run from what one's identity is. Being African is profoundly engrained in me regardless of the way that I attempted to refute my African personality. I became cognizant that I was Black, and hence esteemed to be terrible, at an early age. I recollect that it was consistently the lighter-cleaned individuals in my lesser school in Jamaica who were considered scholastically splendid and who were the teachersÃ¢â¬â¢ most loved understudies. At times it didn't make a difference how enthusiastically you attempted; darker-cleaned understudies were considered substandard and were treated in that capacity. So I figured out how to invalidate my Blackness at an early age, and tutoring made in me a minimized personality. With barely any exemptions, darker-cleaned understudies such as myself were considered mentally sub-par. I persistently asked myself as a youngster, Ã¢â¬Å"Why did my mom need to make me Black with hair like coconut husk when she was fair looking with long hair? Ã¢â¬ When I lived in Jamaica, I was Black and thought about terrible. Some relatives regarded me as substandard versus lighter cleaned family members. For instance, during a short-term visit with a nearby family member, I was given old, torn garments to stay in bed and a sheet to cover myself with, though my lighter-cleaned relative was given fresh out of the plastic new garments and sheet. Different occasions, family members would straightforwardly scorn my short, firmly twisted hair. Everything around me including peopleÃ¢â¬â¢s mentalities showed to me that I was lesser than lighter-cleaned people. A long time later when I returned for a little while, individuals saw that my hair had developed longer and that my skin tone had gotten earthy colored, or lighter. I was currently earthy colored and lovely. Unexpectedly, not until my second year in a Canadian college did I begin liking myself as a person of African family line. My view of myself had been negative regardless of what I used to find out about Black being wonderful, for I experienced a daily reality such that to be Black created sentiments of disgrace, uselessness, and outrage. Albeit Jamaican culture is prevalently comprised of individuals of African family, the truth in the schools and at home didn't really mirror the view that Black was delightful. As Young (2006) attests, To be Black is to have collected a subjectivity frequented by the unearthly hints of a social, political and ideological history. Obscurity is generally and socially explicit encapsulated talk established in and through a desultory convention prepared by the reconstituted figure of Africa and ruthless frameworks of abuse, for example, subjugation and government. (p. 25) 274 Constructing
Thursday, July 16, 2020
United States of a Mystery Essential Georgia Crime Fiction There are several things the south knows how to do well. And while many involve the proper ways to make bread products (biscuits, cornbread, pudding, etc.), one is how to write crime fiction. So Im pleased to be headed back to the land of peaches and peanuts to continue our mysterious tour of the country. To help me out, I reached out to none other than the president of the Atlanta Writers Club, George Weinstein. And we run down some essential Georgia crime fiction. George has helped grow the AWC into one of the countrys largest and proudest writers clubs. So he knows a thing or two about Georgia crime fiction. He also just released his own crime thriller. In it, web-radio host Bo Riccardi is forced to interview her husbands kidnapper live on the air. Which is obvs awful. But does give Bo the opportunity to apply her unique skillset of chromesthesia. You knowâ¦the ability to see colorful shapes which reveal intentions behind speech. Watch What You Say by George Weinstein The book is meticulously researched and opens up a world few of us knew existed. But, more importantly, it packs all the twists and turns youre looking for in a psychological thriller. Both protagonist Bo and antagonist Deke have the depth to carry a book centering around a mano a mano showdown. The highlight of the book, though, is truly the glimpse into chromesthesia. Weinstein lays out the details in a way that informs without ever detracting from the plot. And I found myself actually wanting more science (which he would, in turn, provide). Any book that has me wanting more science has accomplished something. So just in case spending the past decade organizing Atlanta Writers Conferences wasnt enough credibility, George also knows mysteries because he writes mysteries. Which is why I asked him to take us on a little tour of the essential crime fiction of his great state of Georgia. The Marriage Lie by Kimberly Belle Kimberly Belle is the international bestselling author of five novels of suspense. Her third, The Marriage Lie, was a semifinalist in the 2017 Goodreads Choice Awards for Best Mystery Thriller and has been translated into ten languages. A graduate of Agnes Scott College, Kimberly worked in marketing and nonprofit fundraising before turning to writing fiction. The Moaning Bench by Larry Copeland As a journalist for USA Today, The Philadelphia Inquirer, and The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Larry Copeland reported on gang violence, Middle East war zones, the attacks on 9/11, the Oklahoma City federal building bombing, Hurricane Katrina, and many more stories. After 35 years as a newspaper reporter and a cabinet full of awards, he wrote The Moaning Bench, a murder mystery set in Georgia in 1980. Lightning Men by Thomas Mullen Thomas Mullen is the author of Darktown, an NPR Best Book of the Year, which has been shortlisted for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize, the Southern Book Prize, the Indies Choice Book Award, and has been nominated for two CWA Dagger Awards; The Last Town on Earth, which was named Best Debut Novel of 2006 by USA Today, and was awarded the James Fenimore Cooper Prize for excellence in historical fiction; The Many Deaths of the Firefly Brothers; and The Revisionists. His next novel, Lightning Men, which follows the characters from Darktown two years later, was named one of the Top 10 Crime Novels of 2017 by The New York Times Book Review. The Undiscovered Country by Mike Nemeth The Amazon bestseller Defiled and award-winning The Undiscovered Country are the first two installments of the Randle Marks Redemption Trilogy, which is a candy-coated prescription for Americaâs social ills, disguised as a series of crime fiction thrillers. A Vietnam-era Army veteran, he raised a daughter as a single parent while pursuing a career in high technology. In addition to his two novels, Mike has published two nonfiction works about sports: 128 Billion to 1, why no one can predict the outcome of the NCAA Basketball Tournament; and Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics, why the selection committee always chooses the wrong teams to play the college football National Championship. All Beautiful Things by Nicki Salcedo Nicki Salcedo is an Atlanta native and graduate of Stanford University. Her romantic suspense novel All Beautiful Things earned her the Maggie Award of Excellence and a Golden Heart nomination. She writes weekly columns for the Atlanta-based news sites Decaturish.com and AtlantaLoop.com. With two published essay collections, she writes about life in the South and beyond. She has appeared at the Decatur Book Festival, Georgia Center for the Book, and on the radio with GBPs On Second Thought. Shes also taken the stage as part of the Listen to Your Mother and Write Club Atlanta. I do want to add a couple of underrated Georgia crime novels of my own Body Movers by Stephanie Bond The first book in a hilarious series. These self-proclaimed sexy mysteries follow Carlotta Wren, a body mover for a morgue and the daughter of fugitives. Carlotta is as funny a character as youll find, and the books pile on bodies, love interests, and twists galore. The Blue Place by Nicola Griffith This one can be a little hard to find, but it is all kinds of badass. The first part of a trilogy, it centers around a former Atlanta cop and reads like Norwegian noir. But it came out in the late 90s, so, you know, before that was such a thing. This is a writer of a lesbian character who never sinks to using lesbian as a personality. Aud Torvingen has depth and darkness and you will love to watch her right up until she makes you flinch. And you will flinch. Sign up to Unusual Suspects to receive news and recommendations for mystery/thriller readers.
Thursday, May 21, 2020
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Ã¢â¬Å" No my dear,Ã¢â¬ she said. Ã¢â¬Å" Only you.Ã¢â¬ I guess that I should be heading to my room now, I have work early tomorrow.Ã¢â¬ Billy said a little startled. Ã¢â¬Å" Would you like another cup of tea?Ã¢â¬ she said ignoring that Billy wanted to leave. Ã¢â¬Å" No thankyou, I am going to go to sleep now.Ã¢â¬ Billy said even more uneasy. Billy went upstairs just a little bit faster than a walk. He found the room that she showed him when he first got there. He recognized the room, and walked in. He then noticed a white sheet of paper peeking out from under the bed. He then walked closer and picked up the sheet of paper. He read the paper out loud. Ã¢â¬Å" Get out, Get out, Get out, leave this place, leave , leave , while you are still alive.Ã¢â¬ Billy said quietly. Billy nowÃ¢â¬ ¦show more contentÃ¢â¬ ¦Billy was so tired he fell asleep almost immediately after he laid down. Billy woke up all of a sudden scared of what he had dreamed. Ã¢â¬Å" That was the weirdest dream that I have ever had.Ã¢â¬ Billy said. Ã¢â¬Å" What was the dream about?Ã¢â¬ said the landlady standing in the doorway with a knife. Ã¢â¬Å"Oh, nothing I didnÃ¢â¬â¢t see you there.Ã¢â¬ said Billy startled. Ã¢â¬Å" Why do you have that knife?Ã¢â¬ Billy asked quietly. Ã¢â¬Å" What knife? Oh, this knife, well I was putting jelly on toast for your breakfast and I wanted to check on you so I guess that I forgot to put it down.Ã¢â¬ she said laughing at herself. Ã¢â¬Å" What time is it?Ã¢â¬ Billy asked yawning. Ã¢â¬Å" ItÃ¢â¬â¢s 5:00 a.m Mr. Davis.Ã¢â¬ she said. Ã¢â¬Å" ItÃ¢â¬â¢s Mr. Weaver.Ã¢â¬ Billy said annoyed. Ã¢â¬Å" Oh, yes I am very sorry Mr. Weaver. I will go make breakfast now and I might see you down stairs.Ã¢â¬ She said walking away. Ã¢â¬Å" Okay, I will change.Ã¢â¬ he said quietly with a quivering voice. After Billy got on his clothes for work he w ent downstairs carrying his briefcase in one hand and a laptop in the other hand. He set both down and sat on the red chair. There was already toast set up with peanut butter on it on the table with more tea. Billy ate the toast and never noticed the landlady take his laptop. Billy finished the toast and the tea, even though it tasted weird, and went to find the landlady. He called for her and before he finished saying her name she appeared in the doorway. Ã¢â¬Å" Thank you for feeding me, giving me a bed, and being nice to me. I will pay you
Visual Consistency was the main feature of CrispinÃ¢â¬â¢s advertising campaign. They gave full focus to the support background. In both their advertising campaigns they promoted the chicken costume and the Coq Roq Band rather than starting the ad with it and ending with advertising the Tender Crisp chicken and chicken fries. We will write a custom essay sample on Marketing Management, Eleventh Edition or any similar topic only for you Order Now This made the promotion not too commercial and Ã¢â¬Å"uncoolÃ¢â¬ as believed by the young generation. Crispin did not keep the campaign duration very long. They concentrated on creating a surprising, short yet captive campaign as found in www. subservientchicken. com where the last icon was the only indication of BKÃ¢â¬â¢s promotion. They even went on promoting the created Coq Roq Band before airing their ads on MTV and VH-1. The tagline identified by Crispin was Ã¢â¬Å"Have it your way. Ã¢â¬ This tagline was used for all the promotional activities developed for Burger King. This simple but sticky tagline helped in word-of mouth publicity which is considered to be more convincing and effective. Burger King was consistently positioned as the youthÃ¢â¬â¢s eating style. The Brand positioning was such that the young people could identify Burger King with themselves. It was positioned as food (fast food) meant for young men. Simplicity was the central theme of BK as they shied away from being too commercial. The promotion included in-store signage to message on cups with the tagline Ã¢â¬Å"Have it your way. Ã¢â¬ This helped in better retention and understanding of the message by its target audience. Identifiable Selling Point of Burger King is its customized burger service to customers. This is its unique selling point (USP). This means giving a sense of importance and uniqueness to customers as they feel well served. This gives an edge to Burger King over its competitors. Works Cited Page Philip Kotler, Marketing Management, Eleventh Edition, Pearson Education Publishers, Delhi, 2003 How to cite Marketing Management, Eleventh Edition, Essays
Saturday, April 25, 2020
A House is not a Home Religion is a state of who you are. It signifies a persons mental activities as well as their physical attributions to the world that surrounds them. Religion is a form of state that distinguish between different types of groups and cultures. While in a specific religious group, one must abide by all the rules and commit to what the religion has to offer. It is known that when a person disobeys their religious they get looked at as an outsider, or just as a person from another religious group. In This Blessed House written by Jhumpa Lahiri, she expresses how religion can be the cause of destroying a perfect romantic relationship. The couple in the story, Sanjeev and his wife Tanima, also known as Twinkle are both Hindus, which is a religion that was formulated in the country India. After only knowing each other for a few months they had got married and moved in with each other. We will write a custom essay sample on This Blessed House or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Rushing into things was what they did, and moved into a beautiful house, but had no idea what was really behind those walls. The conflict comes up when Twinkle begins finding Christian relics all over the house. Sanjeev wants to put out all the found relics, but Twinkle collects them on the mantlepiece and shows them off to everybody. Twinkle, so ecstatic about finding the Christian relics, she decided to keep them and put them up in the house. Why would she do this when she is definitely Hindi? Was there something behind her action? But,at that point Sanjeev was already upset about the relics being displayed in their household, with people knowing that they are Hindus, not Christians. Sanjeev stated, Ã¢â¬Å"Were not ChristianÃ¢â¬ (146). Meaning, that they should not be affiliated with any type of things related to Christianity. One can see how this action would form a major conflict in Sanjeevs and Twinkles household. Jumpa Lahiris choice of words shows how weak Sanjeevs and Twinkles relationship was. She stated, Ã¢â¬Å"He was getting nowhere with her, whit this women whom he had known for only four months and whom he had married, this woman with whom he now shared his life withÃ¢â¬ (146). Sanjeev refers to his beloved wife as Ã¢â¬Å"this woman. Ã¢â¬ This shows that he has no respect for Twinkle, neither does he care that she cares. One would think, does he really love her? Respect play a huge role in a relationship, and that is what makes one strong. Sanjeev simply does not give Twinkle any kind of respect. For example, when Twinkle finds a Virgin Mary statue, she decided to put it on the front lawn. As Twinkle was taking a bath, she was further disrespect by her husband. As stated in the story, Ã¢â¬Å"he didnÃ¢â¬â¢t knock. he took s breath, and then he informed her very calmly that after finishing his drink he was going to put on his shoes and go outside and remove the virgin from the front lawnÃ¢â¬ (148). It is clear that he has no respect for her because if he did, he would try his hardest to make sure that his wife is happy. It is ironic because in Christian families that is what they do. Maybe that is why Twinkle is cherishing the Christian relics like she did. Maybe she is doubting her roll in the Hindi and is thinking about converting into christian. Every relationship has their own problems, but with Sanjeevs and Twinkles it is different. Its different because the both of them seem to have their doubts of loving each other. According to Lahiri, she said that, Ã¢â¬Å"though she did not say it herself, he assumed then that she loved him too, but now he was no longer sureÃ¢â¬ (147). If Twinkle really loved her husband Sanjeev, she would have said I love you back instantly, but she did not say a word. But as a couple they still had mutual friends who they had invited to their housewarming party. Twinkle wanted to display all the christian items that she had found around the house, but it seemed that Sanjeev was too embarrassed for anyone to see the items. It simply was not because he was Hindus and the relics were Christian. It was because he was self-conscious of what his friends and neighbors would think of them. For example, Sanjeev even stated, Ã¢â¬Å"All the neighbors will see. Theyll think were insaneÃ¢â¬ (146). One can see how ashamed he is toward they things his wife does. This is another example of a conflict which deeply shows his feeling towards the women he supposed to to spend his life with. This can all related to how Sanjeev feels. In the story it seems that the only things he think about is what other people think. People who do that tend to drive themselves crazy and affect the people surrounded around them. For example, in this case Twinkle commits innocent actions just to express what she feels and Sanjeev downgrade everything she does. Sanjeev brought the conflicts of their relationship upon himself because he did not let go and express himself in the way that his wife did. If he were to let go and explore new things in his life he would understand why Twinkle did what she did. He does not understand that people want to see diversity in the world today. For example, if a christian would have came into their home, it would have made that person feel right at home because they would feel comfort around their surroundings. Perhaps this was not the only way to solve their marital problems. Apparently by the end of the story Sanjeev and Twinkles relationship was still rocky and still had a few problems to work on. Although the love was there, it was still confusing if they really loved each other, or was they with each other to fill in the gap of someone just being there everyday. Sanjeev and Twinkles problem will never be resolved if they do not communicate with each other because communication is the key in every relationship. Also, trust is another aspect of a relationship. In this case it seems that Sanjeev will never trust Twinkle. This is so because at the end of the story Twinkle promised to Sanjeev that she will put all the relics away in her study room. Lahiri implied, Ã¢â¬Å"She would never out it in her study, he knewÃ¢â¬ (157). the fact that Sanjeev knew Twinkle was not going to keep her word when she said that shows that all of their problems are still there and never got solved. Religion can sometimes affect a relationship or it can grow and become strong. Unlike Sanjeev and Twinkles relationship, there was a lot that was not understood between the too. Both of their minds were on two different levels. You have Sanjeev who cared what every one thought him, which would make ones life miserable. Then you have his wife Twinkle, who lived her life in the moment. She didnÃ¢â¬â¢t care what people thought of her, she just lived her life freely and with expression. This whole time Sanjeev never dislike the christian relics fully, he just was so afraid to what people would say about his family. Maybe his actions had a lot to do with the way his parents raised him. If Sanjeev and Twinkle too more time out getting to know each other, then their relationship would less confusing, on the simply fact that they would understand why each other act the way they act. Unfortunately, they will never understand each other until they take the time out to connects and share experience with each other, it will efinitely make the relationship stronger. At the end of This Blessed House, the author provides some tender moments between the husband and wife which signals a possible resolution of the deeper conflict in the story. After the narrator describes SanjeevÃ¢â¬â¢s hate for all that his [SanjeevÃ¢â¬â¢s] wife loves, Twinkle asks him to carry the bust of Jesus for her. Then, Ã¢â¬Å"Twinkle gave his elbow a little squeeze and headed for the living room. Sanjeev pressed the massive silver face to his ribsÃ¢â¬ ¦and followed herÃ¢â¬ (157). When Sanjeev pressed the bust into his stomach, there is a sense of forbearance. He signals that even though he hates some of the things Twinkle enjoys, he was willing to deal with them because she is his wife, and they may actually love each other. It takes time for a couple to adjust to having a shared life through marriage, and because they are practically newlyweds, there is hope of a resolution to their deep conflict. That resolution can best be described as patience, growth, and love. When they become certain of their love for each other, then the minute things will no longer matter, and love will make them whole.